0 items ($0.00)
Please wait...
ARTICLESMay 2013 (8)
April 2013 (7)
March 2013 (7)
February 2013 (8)
January 2013 (6)
December 2012 (8)
November 2012 (10)
October 2012 (12)
September 2012 (7)
August 2012 (6)
July 2012 (12)
June 2012 (14)
May 2012 (13)
April 2012 (12)
March 2012 (12)
February 2012 (13)
January 2012 (13)
December 2011 (11)
November 2011 (11)
October 2011 (12)
September 2011 (8)
August 2011 (16)
July 2011 (20)
June 2011 (14)
May 2011 (19)
April 2011 (20)
March 2011 (11)
February 2011 (24)
January 2011 (22)
December 2010 (31)
November 2010 (5)
October 2010 (18)
September 2010 (10)
August 2010 (16)
July 2010 (15)
You may have noticed that, unlike specialty breath freshening products, many common breath mints look alike, from their packaging down to the shape and taste of the mint itself. Well, the companies that make these little tablets are well aware of this, and they have gone to court over the similarities at least once.
In 1973, The United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals heard a rather unusual case, titled Beech-Nut, Inc. v. Warner Lambert Company. The lead circuit jurist, one Judge Moore, summarized the situation in his written decision, which is heavily seasoned with sarcasm:
"This case involves a 'struggle between corporate titans,' in their efforts to create and market cylindrically packaged confections having as their purpose the purification of breath," Moore wrote.
Basically, one breath mint maker felt that their products looked eerily similar to another when sitting on the shelf. They decided to sue. The trial, which lasted six months, was ultimately a misfire, with the two products deemed to look different enough.
While the decision noted that the two companies controlled an estimated 98 percent of the breath mint market at the time, today's consumer has far more choices. For those with halitosis, springing for a specialty breath freshening mint - one that neutralizes odor - may be better than settling for the common kind.
